Anatomy of Criticism by Northrop Frye Essay -- Anatomy Criticism North

Anatomy of Criticism by Northrop FryeIn Anatomy of Criticism, motive Northrop Frye writes of the low mimetic tragic cuneus and the parliamentary procedure in which this wedge is a victim. He introduces the concept of pathos saying it is the study of the discriminate mind, the story of how someone recognizably like ourselves is broken by a conflict between the inner and outer world, between imaginative cosmos and the sort of reality that is established by a social consensus (Frye 39). The hero of Hannah W. Fosters smart, The Coquette undoubtedly suffers the fate of these afore mentioned opposing ideals. In her inability to confine her imagination to the acceptable definitions of early American female social behavior, Eliza Wharton settles victim to the ambiguity of her confederations sentiments of womens roles. Because she attempts to claim the freedom her society superficially advocates, she is condemned as a squeeze and suffers the consequences of exercising an independ ent mind. Yet, Eliza does not stand alone in her dapple as a pathetic figure. Her lover, Major Sanford -- who is often considered the villain of the novel -- also is constrained by societal expectations and definitions of American men and their ambition. though Sanford conveys an honest desire to make Eliza his wife, society encourages marriage as a connection in order to advance socially and to secure a fortune. Sanford, in contrast to Eliza, suffers as a result of adhering to social expectations of a males role. While Eliza suffers because she lives her life outside of her social mixed bag and Sanford falls because he attempts to maneuver and manipulate the system in which he lives, both are victims of an imperfect, developing, American society. Though Elizas ... ... comic hero. This deface seems to be a result of the greater defect of the society in which he functions. Certainly not an innocent and having his own characterization of the comparable fatal flaw as Eliza a decisive determination for liberty -- Sanford shares in the traditional tragic conclusion of isolation and loss. Despite an dinky interpretation that Eliza Wharton deserves her tragic fate because she is too scandalous of a seductress, her fall is actually a result of her desire for autonomy in a society that denies women that right. Also, to view Sanford as a heartless villain would be reductionary. He too, like Eliza, is subject to the judgements, constraints, and values of a flawed society in which he is separated from his true love. Both characters fall as a result of their desire for relational freedoms that early American society denies them.