How Groups Can Influence People in Negative and Positive Ways Essay

How conventions croup curve slew in negative and in electro dogmatic ways. By definition a classify is a number of peck who be regarded as a unit. They are united by a shared interest or belief, be that religion, sport, or politics. All groups own their own identity, we as people have multiple is. From a genial perspective, an individual is often be by who they are and what they do a parent, a child or a friend, and by what line of work or study they are in.Cultural identity is specify by ethnicity, and group identity comes from having a sense experience of be, having a them and us mentality. This essay will facial expression at how antithetical roles and identities can tempt social behaviour when belonging to a group, twain in a negative and a positive way. Tajfel and Turner (1979, cited in spoors et al. , 2011) developed the social identity guess, a theory that describes how belonging to a group forms a significant part in the individual group members self-c oncept. Having a we rather than an I concept.They suggest there are three key stages to joining a group. The first being social categorisation this is for the individual to be precondition over a label Christian, gay, snob, Geordie, disabled are a few examples. The close stage is social identification where the individual takes on the groups characteristics and becomes defined by the groups behaviour. The final stage is social comparison members of a group view it from a positive sharpen of view, often forming an elevated opinion of the group they belong to.People can take on defined roles when involved in group military action influence on these roles can be from observing other members of the groups behaviour, or a personal representation of the defining role. Zimbardo (1971, cited in spoors et al. , 2011) conducted an experiment to determine how roles inside a group can influence peoples behaviour. During the experiment participants were given a guard or a prisoner role. The experiment ended prematurely as participants took their roles to extremes, guards became progressively aggressive, and prisoners became withdrawn and emotionally distressed.This could be an example of how peoples expectations of a role they have no experience in can influence behaviour. They may have been influenced by other members actions, or by a stereotypical character portrayed by the media, confidential information them to have behaved negatively and unwrap of character. Kondo (1990 cited in spoors et al. , 2011) is a Japanese/American learner. In her personal account of living in Japan, she writes how she finds the roles and expectations of her by the Japanese family she is staying with became quite challenging and disturbing.She felt her own identity was belatedly being replaced with the obligation to act appropriately to whichever role she was playing, be it guest, daughter, student or a Japanese woman. During a traditional tea notice Kondo received high praise from her Japanese teacher for her performance. She states she was inordinately bright by the praise but did feel she had to escape before she changed completely, this shows twain negative and positives to social conformity. Kondo feeling pressured into conforming to set standards and rules can in any eggshell apply to some group behaviour.In 1997 the heavens entre cult lost thirty nine members to mass suicide. They believed their souls would be transferred to a spaceship. These members may have become too dependent on the group, perchance so fearful of their leaders to not go ahead, or the sense of belonging and comfort they felt being part of the group they had such conviction in their beliefs they carried the suicide through. This is group conformity to the extreme, and in this case had a negative outcome, but some form of conformity is requirement in society so it can be a return to the majority.Belonging to a group can lead to an in-group out-group culture. With groups bein g defined and identified by their roles, beliefs and behaviour, comparisons are often made between one groups identity and others, be it sports teams, gangs, social groups, religion, or different cultures. Having an inflated opinion of the individuals group can encourage them to view any other group as inferior this can lead to disceptation and conflict between groups. A soundly example of a them and us situation is the robbers cave experiment conducted by Sherif (1961 cited in spoors et al. 2011) A group of boys staying at summer camp were split into two groups, and a tournament was set up. The good sportsmanship of the group quickly turned into enmity and prejudice. Although once given tasks where the two groups had to work together, they boys worked positively and cooperated with each other. In-group traits can exit even where there is no history of involvement between the groups involved. Taifel (1971 cited in spoors et al. , 2011) conducted an experiment where a virtual gr oup situation was set up.Participants were given a task believing they were part of a group, but were in fact working as an individual. In-group favouritism was still present. Loyalty and cooperation is a positive outcome for the in-group mentality, but it has its negative traits in the hostility and aggression it can provoke towards the out-group. Emotional values are given to the individual depending on the behaviour of the group anti-social behaviour would define them in a negative way, just as being seen to belong to a good kind or charitable group would have a positive emotional effect on the individual. To conclude, evidence shows there are umpteen positives to belonging to a group. The individual gains a sense of identity, both deep down the group and in society. Self-esteem, self-worth and sense of belonging are increased. Close bonds are formed with others who share similar characteristics. Having an elevated sense of status at bottom the group can lead to positive behav iour. Self-confidence is increased out-of-pocket to a feeling of safety. Support, praise and encouragement from other group members have a positive impact on behaviour.There are withal many negative aspects to group behaviour, members may be influenced to behave out of character from their usual identity through controlling methods within the group dynamic, in some cases separating the group entirely from accepted behaviour within society. Prejudice, violence and discrimination can also be a vector sum of the us and them situation. The heavens gate example could be viewed as both positive and negative, depending on the perspective, the group members and society would have conflicting views.