Task B Tpp 101

Hoffman and Elwins (2003) article examines The Relationship Between Critical cerebration and potency in Decision Making for new graduate nurses. The authors identify to prove that no cor relation back exists in the midst of higher order ratiocination of new graduates and their ability to make sound clinical choices in relation to patient management. Critical designateing in the breast feeding field is defined as last making based on the analysis of clinical problems through reflection and reasoning to ensure optimum patient outcomes.US and UK studies make no link amidst comminuted persuasion and clinical decision making while Korean enquiry identifies a positive correlation coefficient. cardinal the signifi brush offce of Hoffman and Elwins composition is the lack of evidence supporting a link between the two. The hypothesis states no relationship exists between effrontery in decision making and hypercritical thinking for graduate nurses. The ingest population comprise d 83 graduates from 11 universities across metropolitan and regional NSW, Australia.Using correlation design over twelve months, responses from two groups were collected utilize the 80 point Watson & Glaser Critical thinking assessment tool (WGCTA), a trustfulness in decision making scale, 0-5 range, and demographic questionnaires. Data was collected and analysed using SPSS spreadsheet and informationbase respectively. Results demonstrate a weak negative correlation between critical thinking and decision making for new nursing graduates. As make headway for critical thinking increased a reduction in assured decision making was observed.Therefore graduates sack be grouped as those who think too critic wholey and those who think less critically. The first group of case-by-cases whitethorn reach accurate clinical conclusions but time taken may adversely affect patient outcomes. Conversely, a graduate who thinks less critically may be overconfident taking less time to lead cli nical variables, ultimately placing patients at risk. The hypothesis is therefore rejected. Recommendations ar make to embolden a future clinical environment supportive of practitioners who question decision making.Firstly, a need exists for postgraduate training opportunities which reinforce the domain findings. Secondly, research addressing the shortfalls of sampling design in this particular study should be conducted. Criteria Evaluation Author Credentials Bias loudness abstract of Hoffman Elwins news study publisher shows the authors are well positioned to research and report on the link between critical thinking and decision making in the nursing field. both(prenominal) parties posses their masters degree in nursing and are registered for practice with Hoffman keeping an additional Bsc.In addition to academic qualifications both parties are employed as nursing educators. Weakness Bias may exist in the authors findings. As both Hoffman and Elwin are nursing professio nals and educators the papers scope objectivity can be questioned. Recommendations for future training and research may be seen as self-serving. The inclusion of a third party professional from extraneous the nursing field may provide a complimentary perspective. Accuracy and concord of Data Strength Data has been gathered using recognised reporting tools that are based on established criterion.The subroutine of these tools may encourage future researchers to employ the same methods to promote accuracy and consonance when equivalence existing data with that collected during future research. Weakness The accuracy and dead body of data within the research paper can be questioned. Variations in reported sample size exist in the report and pass on lead readers to doubt the validity of additional data. Data Collection/Analysis Strength The set of instruments used in data collection can be considered sound.The combination of graduate background information and recognised tools much(prenominal)(prenominal) as the WGCTA and Confidence in decision making scale allows for consistency in comparison with previous research findings. Correlations found in the data can therefore be considered significant. Weakness As the authors acknowledge the use of a convenience sample, the reader should conclude that study results are generalised and not representative of regional, state, or national populations.Increased sample size, constitute number of rural and metropolitan graduates, and more detail on individuals age, gender, and learnedness institution would increase data credibility. Graduate IQ or GPA may also play a component part in critical thinking and/or decision making and be included as an additional variable. Analysis Methods and Relevance of Data Strength The authors reference list cites 16 papers from confused countries around the world. This indicates that widespread and applicable investigation into the relationship between critical thinking and deci sion making in graduate nurses has been conducted. Methods of analysis such as he WCGTA and Confidence in Decision-making Scale employed in earlier research allows for comparison of findings. Weakness Despite the relevance of resources and suitableness of analysis tools, some may be considered out of date. Although studies cited in the literary works review are as recent as 2000, Watson Glasers critical thinking appraisal tool dates to 1980. In addition Rhodes work from 1985 gave rise to the Confidence in Decision-making Scale. The use of these tools in an environment as fighting(a) and ever changing as nursing could suggest lack of research on behalf of the authors, or a desire to reach preferred conclusions. exemplification Size Strength The small sample size of 83 graduates participating in the twelve month study allows for close communication between researcher and subject. This may result in improved data lineament highlighting local trends and issues specific to the reg ion. It should also be noted that participants contributed to the study over the twelve month period as there is no mention of withdrawal. Weakness The use of a convenience sample comprising such small numbers cannot be considered representative of target populations at regional, state, or national levels.An increase in the number of participants to represent a greater proportion of the local graduate population would improve both fair play and usability of study findings. Criteria Evaluative comments 1. What difficulties did you encounter completing this task? Initial information of the paper was difficult and time consuming but central to the task. When evaluating the paper many of my selected criteria specifically sample size, data collection, and data analysis contained elements which overlapped. This do it difficult to stay on track. 2.What did you find challenging, but interesting close to this task? Separating the content from the exercise itself. Im really not intere sted in details relating to the nursing profession but proficient summarising and critical thinking/evaluation are academic fundamentals. 3. Why would TPP ci have set this type of a task? What are the learning outcomes of this task? (See your course outline). To establish academic skills that can be make on. Skills developed here will assist in completing line 2. Learning outcomes for participants are to understand, think, learn, communicate, and value. 4. How will you be able to use the skills create in this task in your future studies? These skills will be employ not only to Task 2, but to most if not all future assessment pieces. Active critical thinking/assessment outside of university is also of value. 5. Define three new words that were new to you in this journal article. 1. Meta-Cognitive awareness and understanding of ones own theme processes. 2. Negative Correlation as the set for one variable inrease, the values of the second variable decreases. 3.?